School Violence
Knowing what to do starts with knowing what works, and what hasn't. CrimeSolutions helps practitioners and policymakers understand what programs & practices work, are promising, or haven't worked yet.
On this page you can find programs and practices related to School Violence. Select "Search Filters" to narrow down the list by rating, extent of evidence, and many other aspects of the programs or practices. Skip to Practices
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
Icon | Rating | Program Rating Description | Practice Rating Description |
---|---|---|---|
Effective | Implementing the program is likely to result in the intended outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. | |
Promising | Implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s) | On average, there is some evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. | |
No Effects | Implementing the program is unlikely to result in the intended outcome(s) and may result in a negative outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will not achieve the intended outcome or may result in a negative outcome. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: school violenceTitle | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Profile: Bringing in the Bystander High School Curriculum |
|
Stalking, Violent crime, Assault, Dating violence, School climate, Rape and sexual assault, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Intimate partner violence, Victims of crime | The goal of this bystander-focused, classroom-delivered curriculum is to reduce rates of interpersonal violence among high school students. The program is rated No Effects. The program had no statistically significant impact on various measures of interpersonal violence, victim empathy, and measures of proactive bystander behavior. There was a statistically significant decrease for the treatment group in bystander denial about the role students could play in preventing interpersonal violence. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Prev@cib Program (Spain) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Computers, Campus Crime, Children exposed to violence, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is an anti-bullying program for adolescents in Spain, which is designed to decrease bullying and cyberbullying perpetration and victimization both in the classroom and virtual environments. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in bullying and victimization and cyberbullying and cybervictimization for the treatment group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Olweus Bullying Prevention Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, School violence, Juvenile (under 18), Schools, Child health and welfare, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a schoolwide, multicomponent intervention to reduce and prevent aggression and bullying among students. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant intervention effect on teachers’ ratings of students’ physical, verbal, and relational aggression and victimization. However, there was no statistically significant intervention effect on students’ self-reports of physical and relational aggression and victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Evaluative Conditioning for Adolescent at Risk for Violence (South Korea) |
|
Treatment, Juvenile (under 18) | This program used conditioning methods to change the way at-risk adolescents implicitly think about violence. The goal was to train participants to associate violence with negative, instead of positive, objects or ideas. The program is rated Promising. Adolescents who received evaluative conditioning demonstrated a statistically significant increase in negative implicit attitudes toward violence, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Second Step: Student Success Through Prevention Middle School Program (2008 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a universal, school-based social-emotional learning program aimed at reducing violence and encouraging academic success among middle school students. The program is rated No Effects. While the program had a statistically significant impact on reducing physical aggression, there was no statistically significant impact on sexual-violence victimization and perpetration, peer victimization, bullying victimization and perpetration, cyberbullying, or homophobic name calling. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Home-Visiting Program for Adolescent Mothers |
|
Girls, Mental health, Dropout/expulsion, Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence | This is a community-based program in which adolescent mothers had meetings with trained home visitors, who delivered a parenting and an adolescent curriculum. This program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants demonstrated statistically significantly improvements in parenting skills and school status compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on depressive symptoms, condom and hormonal contraceptive use, or repeat pregnancies. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Ending Violence |
|
Dating violence, School safety, Coping, School climate, Victimization, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a school-based education program designed to teach students the warning signs of dating violence. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant impacts on perceptions of helpfulness in others, likelihood of seeking help, perpetration, victimization, and abusive or fearful dating experiences. However, there was a statistically significant increase in knowledge of dating violence in treatment group students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Bully-Proofing Your School |
|
Bullying, School safety, Positive youth development, Schools, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a school-based intervention program focused on reducing instances of bullying and victimization, while increasing the safety of students in grades 3–5. The program is rated Promising. In all outcomes, the treatment schools showed statistically significant reductions in bullying, victimization, and witnessed aggression, as well as statistically significant increases in perceptions of safety at school. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Teaching Students to Be Peacemakers |
|
School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based, conflict resolution program designed to teach students how to manage conflicts constructively. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of using constructive strategies, such as negotiating, and lower likelihood of using detrimental strategies, compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant effects on the use of smoothing or withdrawing as conflict resolution strategies. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Peacemakers Program |
|
School safety, Gun violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based intervention designed to reduce violence and improve interpersonal behavior in youth. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed a statistically significant positive effect knowledge of psychosocial skills and fewer self-reported and teacher-reported behavior problems, disciplinary incidents, conflict mediation referrals, and suspensions, compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant effect on attitudes toward guns and violence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Too Good for Violence |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a school-based violence prevention and character education program designed to improve student behavior and minimize aggression. The program is rated Promising. The program had statistically significant positive effects on risk and protective factors related to student violence for students in grade 3. There were also statistically significant positive effects on factors related to alcohol, tobacco, drug use, and violence for students in grades 9 through 12. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Responding in Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP) |
|
School safety, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This program for middle school students is designed to provide conflict-resolution strategies and skills to reduce aggressive behavior and prevent violence. The program is rated Promising. Overall, findings were mixed. Results indicated a statistically significant reduction in violent disciplinary code violations and favorable attitudes toward violence for participants, compared with the control group. However, there were no differences between groups in drug use, anxiety, or aggression. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: PeaceBuilders |
|
School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18) | This violence prevention program seeks to reduce negative child behavior for school-aged children. The program is rated No Effects. Overall, there were no differences on teacher and student reported aggression in students. The studies also found mixed statistically significant differences among age groups with students in grades 3-5 displaying less aggressive behavior, but also lower prosocial behavior. The evidence suggests the program did not have the intended effect on students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Safe Dates |
|
Dating violence, Juvenile health, Sex offenders, School safety, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a prevention program for middle and high school students, which is designed to stop or prevent dating violence perpetration and victimization. This program is rated Effective. The intervention group showed statistically significant reductions in psychological, physical, and sexual abuse perpetration, and physical abuse victimization, compared with the control group at the 4-year follow up; however, there were no significant differences between groups on sexual abuse victimization. Date Posted: |
None |
Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Profile: Selective School-Based Violence Prevention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This practice consists of programs designed to prevent or reduce aggressive or violent behavior in K–12 students who are considered at risk of or who have demonstrated such antisocial behaviors. The practice is rated Effective for reducing aggression in students who participated in school-based violence prevention programs, compared with students who did not participate. Date Posted: |
||||
Practice Profile: Universal School-Based Social Information Processing Interventions for Aggression |
|
Dropout/expulsion, School safety, School climate, Schools, School safety, Juvenile (under 18) | School-based violence prevention interventions that target social information-processing difficulties in students, aiming to reduce the aggressive and disruptive behavior of school-aged children. The practice is rated Promising for reducing aggressive behavior in school-aged children. Date Posted: |
||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs |
|
Mental health, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | Designed to foster the development of five interrelated sets of cognitive, affective, and behavioral competencies, in order to provide a foundation for better adjustment and academic performance in students, which can result in more positive social behaviors, fewer conduct problems, and less emotional distress. The practice was rated Effective in reducing students’ conduct problems and emotional stress. Date Posted: |